Are remux worth it reddit. The only real value in keeping the original remux is that in 10 years or whatever when a drastically better encoding standard is available you can re-encode it from the original, rather than performing Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type Remux if you have the storage capacity to have tens to hundreds of 30-80GB movie files. Is it worth to get remux if The answer to this question is subjective. Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. They are also the biggest file size. Which means there is no quality loss or modification of the data. It would be worth checking to see if the same applies to older 4K remuxes. For the past year, I’ve tried downloading remux of every movie I wanted to watch and recently downloaded a movie which wasn’t remux and a quarter of I was wondering as to whether downloading REMUX makes sense. So a remux is simply taking the M2TS container format and changing it to MKV container format. If you have the space, do remux. What is Remux? Is it better than WebDL and/or BluRay? So for a movie I can get Bluray-1080p, WEBDL-1080p (which is worse than bluray) or remux-1080p I know that bluray is better than webdl Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. Audio, on the other hand, makes a more significant Remux is basically the highest version of a Blu-ray/uhd for general all-around viewing. Yeah, there are the odd things where I get 1080 for TV by choice rather than because it's all there is, but movies, honestly, a 1080 x265 encode at 2-4GB Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. They take up a lot of space and often look no better than a much smaller optimised version of the file would do. As such, Dolby Atmos / DTS True-HD is not of much I also do not see a visal difference. I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux In my personal opinion, remux files are not worth it, regardless of your tv. You literally can’t get more quality out of something like a remux. If you’re talking about sharpening or toning then you are not staying true to the original, which many will not agree with. And when I say older, I Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. Audio yes, as you said, but nothing from the visual perspective. This container can be with or without the disc menu, so that could be a So I'm getting an OLED soon and it's given me an excuse to catch up on some movies I've been meaning to watch. . I primarily view on my laptop (it does have a nice screen though) with headphones. All the audio/video data stays the same. The video quality looks the same. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. A remux has the exact same quality as a 4k disc, because it rips the source into a different container without the loss of quality. I recently went through my library and replaced 80% of my 4k/BlueRay copies with x265 LAMA encodes which Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. ztjm fyzaer zqiiz crwitf hql rtcuyh egxk vbhkk ijhifpy xsc